welshbowls.myfreeforum.org

Register

geraint jones · Orange Belt Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 329

W.P.A. 2009 / 2010 A.G.M. to FOLLOW Welsh Counties A.G.M. at The Royal British Legion Colwyn Bay on Tuesday 1st December 2009

If anybody requires anything for discussion, please advise by P.M. or Email within the next 21 days

geraintjonesandco@btinternet.com

Many thanks
_________________
Pain is temporary, pride is permanent

freak · Brown Belt Joined: 15 Apr 2009 Posts: 498

mmmmmmmmmm
_________________
If you can see it..... BANG IT.. Smile

YANCE · Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:34 am Post subject:

Hi Geraint, would an official proposal be required regarding the qualification process for the WPA ? If so, can you inform me of the way in which i submit such a proposal.
Many thanks. Yance.
_________________
street maps & juice.

geraint jones · Orange Belt Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 329

YANCE · Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:44 pm Post subject:

Hi Geraint, you will know what my proposal is, based on the posts made following this years qualifying rounds.
If you ensure that all interested parties pay their entrance fee for qualification beforehand, you know that it would be less likely to have people not turning up. On the 21st of Sept, a post of yours said that some members were willing to pay £25 to enter, well i dont need to tell you that if people pay that much, there is no way that they will fail to attend.
If you limit the entry to 36, @ 12 groups of 3, then you have a fair round robin system. It would help to have a reserve list, to cover the possibility of an absense due to unforeseen circumstances.
Ultimately in a worst case scenario, if you still end up with groups of 3,&4 due to missing persons, then you make sure that the players in groups of 4, play all 3 games, and not just 2, as was the case this year.
A post was forwarded following this years qualifier, and i quote, it stated, IF YOU ALLOW A WINNER TO PLAY A LOSER IN GAME 2 OF A GROUP OF 4, YOU COULD END UP WITH ALL 4 PLAYERS WINNING 1 GAME, AND CONSEQUENTLY, THE WINNER WOULD BE DECIDED BY AGGREGATE. The post went on to say that it would be NONSENSE if that happened, and by using your current system of a winner playing a winner, you at least had someone who had won 2 games. Well Geraint, you have said that you are in favour of 12 groups of 3, so whats the difference ? you can have 3 players who each win 1 game, and the eventual qualifier goes through on aggregate. I hope to hear off you, and also hope that this will be discussed at the AGM. Regards, Yance.
_________________
street maps & juice.

geraint jones · Orange Belt Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 329

10 days and No bites Yance, l feel some may not understand !!!! just hope you can attend the meeting
_________________
Pain is temporary, pride is permanent

YANCE · Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:15 pm Post subject: WPA, AGM

Hi Geraint, i cant see why people would,nt understand my proposal, i hope it was clear enough for you, and for others.
Yes, i will be attending the AGM, can you let me know what time it starts ?

Regards, Yance.
_________________
street maps & juice.

geraint jones · Orange Belt Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 329

freak · Brown Belt Joined: 15 Apr 2009 Posts: 498

Lets be honest something does need changing as current method used didnt work last time at Coedpoeth or did it?
Also am i right in thinking that the WPA is used to VET greens for possible use in county matches.??? If YES what percentage of greens used in WPA have actually been used in county games? If NO why??

Smile

_________________
If you can see it..... BANG IT.. Smile

geraint jones · Orange Belt Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 329